Why, as I was frantically sorting through
my perfume collection to select which bottles I would bring to Canada, did I
pull out Private Collection? Perhaps I thought it would trigger the
much-vaunted Proustian effect anybody who writes anything about scent always
ends up banging on about.
I’ve known Private Collection since
I was a kid growing up in Montreal’s West Island, nosing around the Estée
Lauder counter at the local department store -- the promise of a forbidden,
just-for-grownups world. Estée Lauder fragrances being powerhouses, you could smell
them in the mall all the way back to the fountain with a reproduction of Michelangelo’s
David in front of Canadian Tire, pungent rubber fumes blending for a while with
potent wafts of Youth Dew, long before crossing the threshold of Eaton’s.
No French perfume stood a chance (that was before the take-no-prisoners Opium
came along and gobbled up every other scent in sight).
But more than Youth Dew, the 1973 Private
Collection is one of the first fragrances that left a lasting olfactory imprint
on my memory. My mother may have gotten a mini as a gift with purchase (there
were no full perfume bottles in our house since the stuff gave my father a headache).
I vividly remember Private Collection even
as I write this: that sharpish, fresh-mown grass opening, with the darker
resinous green of galbanum and spicier floral verdancy of hyacinth whooshing in
straight behind it. Not a complex olfactory picture, and one I formed a
posteriori, since it would be a could of decades or more until I’d smelled
galbanum and hyacinths in France. Until then, I’d have had no names for
what I experienced.
The actual fragrance, I didn’t smell that
much since childhood: I’m not even sure it’s sold in France, and when I
purchased a bottle for memory’s sake in Montreal about ten years ago, the beauty
advisor pulled it out from under the counter: there were no testers.
That’s the bottle that made the trip to
Canada. I hadn’t smelled it since buying it, I’m embarrassed to say. I didn’t
smell it before packing it. I suppose I thought that because I hadn’t experienced
it often, thus overlaying my initial childhood memories with later, more
scent-literate references, my olfactory flashback would be all the more vivid.
So ? Zilch.
Nada. Rien du tout. Private
Collection has given up
the ghost. Not only does it not trigger some magical Proustian effect, but it
doesn’t even smell like my adult memory of it. Though I preserved it in optimal
conditions (in its box, away from light and heat), it’s gone off, pure and simple.
And since the stuff doesn’t seem to be sold in Canada anymore, there’s not much
chance I’ll get that flashback to my suburban childhood after all.
Loving perfume is an exercise in letting
go. Like people and memories, it changes, fades, and eventually, dies.
I’d ask the question if I thought anyone
would comment: have you ever “lost” a fragrance you were certain would bring
back vivid memories?
Illustration: White Hyacinth
18.04.-27.04.2022 by Paul Maria Schneggenburger
Hello, Denyse -- I sense a note of sadness in saying that you'd ask the question if you thought anyone would answer -- sadly, I do not have a thoughtful answer to your question (yet).
RépondreSupprimerBut as an old lurker on your blog and a new reader of your book, The Perfume Lover, I just wanted to drop a line to say that you have such a gift for writing and insight. I am enjoying the book very much, and I hope that you continue to write on your blog! As someone who grew up in the late 90s and early aughts, your deep knowledge of perfume history and the various worlds cultural/historical worlds it encompasses has been very instructive to me. Many thanks! -Lauren
Thank you Lauren for your kind words! I'm so happy you're enjoying the book. It's lovely to know it keeps on finding readers a decade after coming out!
SupprimerI said I wasn't sure anyone would answer because the blog has been dormant for so long its readers have long dispersed. And it seems the conversation has now shifted to other platforms.
Musc ravageur is a perfume I lost to reformulation. despite the current version being quite lovely I just don’t get that jolt of recognition when I smell it. It was one of my early niche loves, a perfume I associate with a more adventurous period of my life. There’s something about the opening that just isn’t quite the same anymore, that association of cloves and lavender with the amber musk that made the sweetness in it always a suggestion rather than the center.
RépondreSupprimerThe ambery* musk
SupprimerI know what you mean about Musc Ravageur, it doesn't feel the same to me either. I have a new bottle but I hasn't made the trip to Canada because every time I sprayed it on something felt off... It was never my favorite Malle but it was one of the first I bought and you're right, it feels more cloying than it used to.
SupprimerDear Denyse, for so many years I checked your blog until I got distracted from perfume in general. I can't believe I missed your return. I hope you are well and will search further to to see what you are writing. Wishing you the best for 2024!
RépondreSupprimerFantastic website there is a ton of useful information here.
RépondreSupprimerThank you for your sweat, of course!
RépondreSupprimer